Fidelity's Dirty Intraday Data
Author: jonludwig
Creation Date: 2/18/2009 5:37 PM
profile picture

jonludwig

#1
Any reason why Fidelity is publishing intraday data with so many bad Highs & Lows?
Take a look at SPY on a 1 minute chart. This could easily be cleaned up with a bad tick filter.
profile picture

Cone

#2
Unfortunately, those ticks actually occur, and it seems there's nothing practical that can be done about it with the current Fidelity provider. For now, use the bad tick filter - it works well in 5.3.

Also, in 5.3, you can double-click a bar and correct it manually in a static chart. Once that's done, those corrections will also be used in streaming charts.

For the record, Fidelity's 1-minute chart of SPY yesterday looks identical to eSignal's chart except for the large spike on the 10:12 bar.
profile picture

jonludwig

#3
The trades don't occur, just the bad ticks. They are usually the result of a very late posted trade.
Will the bad tick filter work for historical data?
profile picture

TrendCatcher

#4
But the bad ticks play huge bad tricks. They make the script not display proper results. I have few scripts display information based on the bad tick data. Makes a ton of difference in making a choice. I think it could be part of the manipulation around.
profile picture

Cone

#5
The bad tick filter only filters streaming data. That's the only opportunity Wealth-Lab has to see the ticks and compare if 2 consecutive ticks are x% apart.
profile picture

TrendCatcher

#6
Cone,
How come we don't have streaming charts during extended hrs in WL 5.3 unlike in WL 4.5?
profile picture

Cone

#7
WLP 4.5 was somehow able to get snapshots of post market data in a streaming chart - it wasn't streaming, and it was a mistake.

Although Wealth-Lab can help with discretionary trading, that's not its main purpose, and I assume that's why Fidelity doesn't provide pre/post market data in Wealth-Lab. There could be other reasons.
profile picture

hb

#8
I'm just starting to work with WLP 5 and haven't done anything in build 4.x in many years.

I thought FIDCO does a review every night correcting bad data. I would think that FIDCO would use the corrected data in their historical data files. No?

I'm a bit confused about the relationship between Streaming data used for back testing and that used for trading. Say I have script that is supposed to trigger a sell when a stock trades 10% below its moving average. When I'm back testing it will of course act on any bad data that is there and sell on inaccurate information. However when I am actually trading with this script and there is a bad tick will it also trigger a sell? What would be the execution price for a market order? The bad tick price or the actual market? I assume it would trigger the sell and it would trade at the actual market in which case the back testing is more or less useless. Am I wrong?
profile picture

Cone

#9
Corrections are applied, but most ticks that occur away from the inside market are actually valid - it's just that you and I don't want to see them in our data. On the other hand, those prints may mean something to somebody using a more discretionary strategy.

QUOTE:
I'm a bit confused...
This subject is treated in the User Guide, Orders > Portfolio Synch > Theoretical vs. Actual.
profile picture

redliontrader

#10
I like the title, I think you should change it to "Fidelity's dirty little secret" - lol. (don't you just hate people that laugh at their own jokes)

Because the data is sooooooooooo bad from Fidelity, it prevents me from auto-trading. I find that I have to trade discretionary because I have to decide before each trade if the data is any good.

Here is a picture of today (March 4th's) 1 minute data:



And for comparison the same data from TradeStation:


I don't have e-signal so I can not vouch for that, but I do have StockFinder and Etrade as well as TradeStation and none of these have such dirty data. I have complained for years, but because of the crazy arrangement in the relationship between Fidelity and Wealth-Lab nothing ever gets better. Just lots of finger pointing.

Unfortunately Fidelity does not provide us a place to bitch, so we dump our frustration here at the WLP site, because WL does foster a community. I am sure working the data divide is very frustrating for WL. I embrace everyone's frustration, all around.


btw: now that I know how to embed images one the the things that bugs me about the WLP site is the button below the post that I am currently editing. It looks like this:



The big green button says edit, but I am already editing, and I did not hit it to edit. (I hit a link).

Now that I am done I want to "Save" as opposed to Cancel. My point being, don't you think that green button should read "Save" instead of "Edit"?

profile picture

hb

#11
Thank you Cone for your reply. The information in the user guide will, I'm sure, be helpful.

I'm afraid I don't understand what you are saying in the first paragraph. What are
QUOTE:
ticks that occur away from the inside market?
Why don't we want to see them? what is
QUOTE:
a more discretionary strategy?
profile picture

jonludwig

#12
redlion,
I see those bad SPY ticks all the time on the historical intraday data. That is exactly what I am talking about. Fidelity never corrects them, and they are NOT real. Often times in stocks, wayward ticks are real. I know, because I am often on the other side of those trades. This cannot and will not happen in a highly arbed ETF like SPY or QQQQ, yet the bad ticks are all over the intraday historical data.
profile picture

Algotrader

#13

Fix bad data trick ?

So how can I purge my Fido dataset and use Yahoo for my database? I am guessing I would have to switch back and forth to do real time trading which incrediably has filtering....

Trade station has like 3 tiers of rules to allow trading like must hit NBBO two time or trade inside bid. Why is Fido so full of hoeuy?

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with that, but you can opt-out if you wish (Read more).